Charles Matthews wrote:
You have no idea about my intentions, so leave it out.
Ditto. Does that make my point clear enough for you?
I note that you posted 14 times to this list yesterday. On one thread, which I was not reading. That strikes me as quite enough traffic.
Many of my posts have been for the purpose of defusing possible flare-ups. On the other hand, I wasn't aware there was a post quota as well as a "no flames" policy.
If you can't take a reasonable prompt that this is not UseNet, then that would be your problem. The fact that you typed a two-paragraph reply to my mail, and hit return, all within three minutes, strikes me as good evidence that you are a hasty, combative poster.
Actually, I just type quickly (typically close to 100wpm), and my computer beeps when new email arrives. It kinda comes with the necessities of one of my jobs. Claims that you understand my intentions based on how quickly I offer responses are spurious at best.
Now, if you have anything to post about improving the English Wikipedia, please do so.
Yes, I have: Don't try to demonize me. You can make veiled threats about shutting me up all you like, but the fact remains that you've made inaccurate statements about my actions and intentions, and you don't seem to care that I tried to correct those innacuracies. I even apologized for my misstep, but (again) you don't seem to care.
I've made my point to my own satisfaction. If you insist on continuing to berate me for something I haven't done, you can do so without my help.
-- Chad