On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Chris Howie cdhowie@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net
wrote:
Those who are familiar with the long lasting quiz show "Jeopardy",
will
be pleased to know that "What is Wikipedia" was the correct question yesterday to the answer, "this website had Hilary Clinton's picture replaced with that of a walrus." :-D
I thought they were synonymous?
Badum, ching.
No. 54% of the electorate would rather have the walrus as president than any of the three presidential candidates still standing.
Besides, as a bottom-feeder, the walrus is well-adapted to politics already. It has also developed a thick skin, which certainly can't hurt its chances of surviving the ordeal.
-Matt
Oh, come on now. You and I both know where the walrus stands on Roe v. Wade, and exactly how many times it has flip-flopped on important issues to please the powers that be. The walrus does not have the country's best interests at heart.
Now the LOLrus, on the other hand, there's a guy with dedication to an issue...
FF