slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
<snip>
Because lots of editors focus on the centrality of NPOV, they feel they have to include a criticism from somewhere, anywhere, and you end up with an article that reads like this: "Jane Doe (born 1938) was a Roman Catholic nun and aid worker, described by the New York Times as 'the embodiment of Christ on earth.' The Roman Catholic church has been heavily criticized for the willingness of its followers to interfere in the affairs of the developing world, according to Militant Magazine."
<snip>
Sarah
But if there is no published criticism of the nun, it certainly would not be POV to exclude the (obviously unsourced) criticism, no? NPOV is about representing all the different POVs about a subject without favouring any of them. If it so happens that there is only one (published) POV of a subject, then representing only that POV would be neutral, no? :-{
John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]])