On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, David Goodman wrote:
The existing situation is of great assistance to another species: the wiki-barrister, expert is using whatever legal processes are available to achieve equity. . If such a person intuitively think an article should be kept, they will find arguments to keep it, and vice-versa. For essentially every article at AfD contested in good faith, they could find plausible arguments based on policy for either keeping or deleting. For the unscrupulous subspecies, they could find arguments of some sort for a good deal that is not really reasonably contestable.
This is of course true too. People don't think video game composers deserve to have articles; so they argue for non-notability.
Whether this should be the case is another story. I consider this to be an abuse of the rules.