On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:18:22 +0000, David Boothroyd david@election.demon.co.uk wrote:
I assumed when it said that people would be judged on the merits of their contributions, and that evidence of bias in real life was no evidence of biased editing, that this meant what it said.
Indeed it does. And yet you steadfastly refuse to believe those who tell you that your *contributions* (including on Talk) are the problem, choosing instead to blame some notional external factors. Funny, that.
Guy (JzG)