Ray Saintonge wrote:
John Vandenberg wrote:
However, the issue of access to copyvios increases with the number of admins. In my opinion this isnt solved with less admins, but by expunging copyvios completely or further restricting access to them. In this, I am more thinking about copies of articles from other encyclopedias, as opposed to the snippets taken from a website. These copyvios are of limited usefulness to admins after a few days and should be inaccessible, both in the article history and the deletion log; instead a boilerplate page should alert the reader that the version they have requested is a copyvio and provide the details, such as source, contributors name, etc. All access to these copyright violations after it has been removed should be restricted to case by case needs.
Some broad access to these copyvios may still be needed for admns. Putting "COPYVIO" in big letters across its face could make it unusable except for checking out possible copyvios. Some popular pictures may very well keep being uploaded by other users who are unaware of the previous determination.
Ec
IANAL, but this seems reasonable to me...unless there was some potential value in an image with COPYVIO emblazoned upon it.
-Rich