Stan Shebs wrote:
Yes, the 32K limit should still be encouraged. Not only is there still the risk of old browsers mangling long articles, but this is the encyclopedia, not wikibooks. People delighting in long articles should consider that 99% of readers will drop off long before they get to the end of a 5,000-word article, so it's as if the material at the end doesn't even exist; better to make several shorter articles interlinked so readers can steer to the desired details more quickly.
Stan
Stan, those readers will probably drop off after 32KB anyway. Best to fixup the lead section and let them read that.
TBSDY