On 10/9/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 16:49:56 -0500, "Parker Peters" onmywayoutster@gmail.com wrote:
My thoughts exactly. "Parker Peters"' last example turned out to be an unambiguous vandalism sock. I'm beginning to wonder if perhaps Parker Peters isn't better known to us by another name...
"Unambiguous"? Hardly. Unless you didn't bother to read my reply earlier?
Yes, I read it. I also reviewed the contribution history, which is after all the main thing.
As did I. And I came to the opposite conclusion. It's my opinion that the edits might have been poorly phrased but they met the standard of RS, V, and were consistent with writings in other articles we have regarding the same subject matter.
Your definition of "vandalism" seems to be that you disagree with an edit.
That's not a definition of "vandalism" that anyone at Wikipedia is
supposed
to follow, and the last person I met who followed that was a definite pov warrior.
Nope. It was a POV warrior and a pretty blatant sock. Honestly, not worth the bytes already spilled.
Again, I reached the opposite conclusion.
Now, where are the diffs Jimbo asked for? The last case seems much
more interesting.
The diffs were forwarded to Jimbo directly in a private email, before his public request for diffs. I'm waiting for his private response on the matter.
Parker