On 05/02/2008, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen cimonavaro@gmail.com wrote:
Really it would help to approach images by starting with the cases that aren't so loaded with controversy. If you want to make progress unraveling difficult issues, start unraveling at a point where you can unravel at least a few loops.
Here's one we face regularly for... well, for anyone still alive whose prominence was in the 1960s or so.
Do we have a contemporary photograph of them, or one from their heyday? How do we characterise them - the grand (or decayed!) old figure, or the bright young thing?
Licensing issues, inevitably, point us towards a freely-created image, which almost always means a new creation... but is that the best way to present the article?