Quoting Sam Spade samspade.thomasjefferson@googlemail.com:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=God&diff=46806965&oldid=46...
It is not immediately obvious to me why we shouldn't mention that most living people believe in God as Creator in the first line of our article if that is, in fact, the case. Your reference, however, only shows that most Americans believe in God as Creator, which is probably not something to include in the first line of that article. I also note that you wikilinked to the article on Satanism from the mention of Dystheism. I suggest that is crediting modern Satanists with a much better grasp of theodicy than is the case.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Socialism#Unsubstantiated_claims
This link leads to you stating baldly that Socialism is in some way essentially racist, and a handful of editors commenting that they don't think that most socialists are racists. I don't understand what you want us to take away from that conversation. It certainly doesn't suggest to me the existence of some kind of pro-socialism cabal on Wikipedia as implied by your email.
I do notice that the article is absurdly long, disjointed, full of uncited weasel words, a patchwork of various hobby-horses, and something like half of it renders in an underlined blue font. That makes it pretty much in line with the rest of our top-level politics articles.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Sam_Spade
When some number of your peers are suggesting that you have a blind spot when it comes to your own beliefs and that and that you seem to think your edit-warring is more acceptable than it is, it might be worth your time to consider that criticism seriously.
Jkelly