On 11/28/05, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/28/05, Kelly Martin kelly.lynn.martin@gmail.com wrote:
[[m:Voting is evil]]
Kelly
The alturnatives are worse-Churchill
The voteing softwear avoids a lot of the normal downsides of voteing by not revealing who has voted for what. There is also the issue that with hundreds of people wanting to have a say it is the only real way to gage final opinion.
I think Kelly's point loses a lot when taken out of context:
On 11/28/05, Kelly Martin kelly.lynn.martin@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/28/05, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
We need consensus? Let's hold a two-week, site-wide vote with Concorcet (sp?) voting. And it's going to be binding.
[[m:Voting is evil]]
Kelly
and my email was in response to
On 11/28/05, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
And the community would be completely useless without the servers. Somewhere between the two a consensus needs to be reached. The community can't overthrow the arb com without the support of the board, and the board can't institute the arb com without the support of the community.
So you appear to be arguing under a misconception. Kelly may think voting for ArbCom members is evil. However, she didn't say so, so don't put words in her mouth.
-- Sam