On 10/04/07, Seraphim Blade seraphimbladewikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/9/07, Matthew Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/9/07, Seraphim Blade seraphimbladewikipedia@gmail.com wrote:
"From the independent sources available, could a comprehensive, high-quality (GA/FA) article be written on this subject someday?"
I think this would be a terrible criterion to use for this purpose. Not every worthwhile subject has sufficient to say about it to make a FA or even a GA as currently defined.
-Matt
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Ah, there's the rub, as Shakespeare would say. Perhaps B-class would work as a compromise, but there's got to be some kind of uniform standard. Otherwise, it's pretty much "Whatever anyone wants to write about gets written about," and then we're introducing editorial bias. We should handle inclusion/exclusion the same way as we handle anything else-look at what the sources say (or don't say, for that matter).
But our inclusion criteria introduces bias too. Subjects which are perceived to be related to high culture are more likely to be included than subjects perceived to be related to "low culture". IMO, this is not a good thing.