There is simmply no upside and lots of downside to 'lots more banning'. Mark
--- Stan Shebs shebs@apple.com wrote:
Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales wrote:
I do wonder how, in the long run, we will deal more
effectively with
the kind of POV warrioring that leads to entries
like this
one... where politically motivated hysteria leads
to blatant factual
errors.
Lots more banning, I suspect. There is simply no upside and lots of downside to letting WP be hijacked by political partisans, and they will keep coming, in ever-larger numbers, as long as they find WP a congenial soapbox. We need a process to identify the avowed partisans and kick them off after no more than a week, instead of agonizing over them for months and sucking up massive amounts of time that could be used more productively.
Partisans are actually easy to recognize, because they are completely unable to admit that the other side might possibly be right about an issue. If you were to ban anybody who refused to acknowledge the possible validity of a different point of view, you'd see a whole more useful discussion on talk pages.
Stan
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com