On 16/09/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/16/06, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
If it's against policy, it must be bad for some reason, so just explain to me what it does that's bad.
You wish to waste other people's time?
If your only argument is "it's against process", you have no argument.
I figure anything so complex an admin who's been editing for two and a half years can't do it is fundamentally broken.
You realise you've just claimed that our copyright policy is fundamentally broken? We've got enough problems with people ignoring it or trying to get around it we don't need any more.
Assume good faith. He's helping Wikipedia to illustrate a point.
- d.