Steve Bennett wrote:
Fwiw, Wikipedia really doesn't seem to be able to make its mind up on exactly how much "terminology" we accept. WP:NOT quite clearly says we don't teach people how to talk like a Cockney chimney sweep. Right after it clearly says that glossaries for specialized fields are ok. And right before it says that articles about items of slang may be appropriate.
Entirely by coincidence, I just happened across an article that seems to me like a perfect example of the sort of "terminology" article that's good to have in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naming_the_Gulf_War. Naturally, it wasn't in [[Category:Terminology]] or any of its subcats when I got there. :)