Brock Weller wrote:
All of them from what i've seen. I pointed out several that they fail, you are more them welcome to read the rest of the thread if you desire to participate.
On 9/9/07, Rich Holton richholton@gmail.com wrote:
Brock Weller wrote:
Unencyclopedic crap is cut all the time. If it doesn't meet our goals its dropped, nothing against the contributer, but it doesn't fit. We make subjective judgements all the time, and establish standards to help us decide in the future. Our standards on notability are largely subjective, as are our standards on what are reliable sources. These trivia sections don't meet our content criteria and we've been stripping them for months. Thats a functional consensus there. And it appears far from being the consensus against it that you'd need at this stage of the purge.
*Which* trivia sections don't "meet our content criteria"? All of them? And whose content criteria are you referring to?
-Rich
I have been following the thread, and I don't see how you can possibly make a blanket statement that all trivia sections don't meet "our" criteria. And I notice that you didn't answer who "our" refers to.
-Rich