"Tony Sidaway wrote:
Nicholas Knight said:
No, it's an objection to shoving explicit and disgusting images in what is supposed to be an encyclopedia for the purpose of trying to force the world to somehow "de-prudify" itself.
Who has advanced this argument for including the picture?
No one. If you'll look back at the exact sequence of the conversation, you'll understand where this came from. It's predicated on images like the autofelleto one becoming accepted parts of Wikipedia, and is not specific to the photograph in question."
------
I share Nicholas'es concerns here. It is , in my firm opinion, very unfortunate that links to porno sites (eg that autosolo one) have become standard practice here. We do not need porno pictures becoming standard practice.