I've been having a lot of problems on Wikipedia lately. I also notice that admins apply double standards. Now I've been accused of beginning a "sockpuppet" account, and I want to begin by complaining about a suspected "sockpuppet" account myself.
Wikipedia needs improvement. There's no doubt about it. The mechanisms in place at the moment do not function well and seem too difficult to use. Moreover, it's too much for someone who doesn't want to have to spend too much time with the political part of the organization as he already has another organization and other things to do. I think I want it to end with a good approach to the Arbitration Committee if necessary, and I've refrained so far because I haven't wanted to "illustrate a point." However, even the rules get questionable descriptions and arbitrary applications.
Ideas/Help?
Could you be a little more specific? If you suspect someone of being a sockpuppet, you need to say who, otherwise no-one can do anything about it. What parts in particular do you think need improving? (You are certainly right, things aren't perfect, and never will be, but we need to be specific about what is wrong if we are going to improve anything.)