Stan Shebs wrote:
<snip>
Also, by saying "non-commercial only", you're excluding many worthwhile activities, for instance a 1-person print shop that's taken a job producing brochures for a women's shelter. Even though the shelter might be non-profit, if the print shop is a normal company, your non-commercial restriction prevents the shop from using your pictures in the brochure they produce.
Stan
Minor nit-pick: that situation is improbable because IIRC the brochure (if it used GFDL material) has to include the whole whopping GFDL licence in it. That's why Wikitravel (or whatever they're called) used the Creative Commons licence instead. Your basic analogy/example/metaphor/whatever still holds, though.
John Lee ([[User:Johnleemk]])