On 9/12/06, Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 12, 2006, at 10:28 AM, Anthony wrote:
He gave examples of exceptions, but nothing to suggest whether or not these were special cases or the majority.
Anthony, please stop pontificating to actually look at things occasionally. Danny offered the list at [[Wikipedia:Vital articles]]. Go look at it, and you can see how many are featured, how many are good, and how many require cleanup.
That list has absolutely nothing to do with what I was talking about. Danny suggested that "Instead of asking people to create brand new article, the focus should be on improving existing articles." I asked why. Yes, there is a list of articles which need improvement. There is also a list of articles which need to be created. Why is one list more important than the other?
In the meantime, I'm placing you on moderation on this list. Posts that obviously fail to engage what people are saying, or that otherwise fail to engage reality in a sufficiently useful way will be rejected.
Whatever is easier for you.
Anthony