On 6/29/06, SPUI drspui@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
On 6/30/06, SPUI drspui@gmail.com wrote:
I have been blocked for a week (initially indefinitely, then unblocked by another admin and reblocked for a week by the initial admin) for the contents of a page I made in January *2005* - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SPUI/jajaja .
The page was recently listed on MFD. You reverted the MFD notice. Why?
Hmmm - I was pretty sure I had kept it while reverting a blanking, but on looking back at it, it appears I did remove it. My mistake.
This was not listed as a reason for the block, and the block happened 2 days after the last notice was put on the page (by someone else, of the DRV).
I fail to see what the proximate cause was of the block. Using the page (after it had been MFD and during DRV, when it had relatively respected defenders) as an excuse seems poor judgement.
I agree that if the page was disruptive it should be subject to deletion policy etc, but if it was so disruptive that it warranted invoking the Arbcom probation, someone should have said so at the time.