I've unblocked you but take heed. The _only_ reason i unblocked you is because anthony wasn't blocked. You violated the 3RR and so did desearve the block - note that the three reverts are in a 24 hour period - so if you revert the night before and again the next morining you may break the rule without really realising it.
I know you were restoring the consensus version, I know that sockpuppets were used - but there is no need for you to revert war. Do your three reverts and then step back from the article - I assure you that someone else will take up the reigns because as the votes on the talk page there is an overwhelming majority in favour of having the picture.
I do not support any action against chrisO. The policy is new, we are still finding our feet with it.
Please take my advice - a rule is a rule and we all have to follow them. (If you are going to the wikimeet tomorrow night - I'll see you there)
Therresa
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 22:48:28 -0000, John Bradley john@ontobus.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I seem to have been disabled for breaking the 3RR. My last 3 msg being 10 hours after the previous bring it to four, and happened when User:Anthony DiPierro engaged in deliberate vandalism of the Clitoris page. I wasn't diabled until about 5 hours after the last revert.
User:Anthony DiPierro who revert four times to my three this morning has been left online by user:ChrisO.
I think my account should be reanabled and User:Anthony DiPierro disabled and user:ChrisO admin rights should be removed. It seems a pervers use of the 3RR for whatever reasons.
ChrisO should provide an explanation of his slective and deleyed action. Yours
John BradleyLoc: 15/22 Gambier Terrace, Liverpool, L1 7BL, UK. Phone: +44 (0)151 708 7238 Email: john@ontobus.co.uk WWW: www.ontobus.co.uk
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l