G'day Pete,
Kirill Lokshin wrote: "...to an openly anti-Wikipedia site"
From http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Wikitruth:Editing_guidelines
"some amazing people are working behind the scenes and in the front lines over there [i.e. at Wikipedia], putting in the hours to make a difference and make Wikipedia better. [...] We wouldn't have this site if we didn't respect and love the concept of a Wikipedia. It's the implementation we have issues with."
I believe them when they say they are pro-Wikipedia. I've been astonished by how many Wikipedians are unwilling to be open to criticism (one of the essential elements of a cult by the way :) !) I don't agree with their vehemence of the opposition to WP:OFFICE. But anyone who's been following this debate about Erik and Danny will realise its implementation has been completely ham-fisted at times. So disagree with Wikitruth, and prove it wrong, but don't lie about it.
I agree with you: this is just Wikipolitics by other means, as opposed to the straight anti-Wikipedia bizzo peddled by Britannica (through fear) or Brandt (through sheer kookiness).
I wouldn't describe what Kirill said as a "lie", though. It's a fairly easy mistake to make, especially given the poisonous content of some articles (like the silly thing about Jimbo's daughter, or the hate shrines to certain admins). WikiTruth may not be anti-Wikipedia, but it's definitely anti-Wikipedian.
Endnote: Yes they did copy an article about a member of Jimbo's family that lingered in the database for several days. I am glad they are embarassed about that and have deleted it. Makes their motivations more believeable.
I, too, am glad that they deleted the article, and I agree that it makes them just a smidgeon more credible ... as credible as a group who plan to upload articles known to be defamatory, going out of their way to hurt innocent people because they want to mock Wikipedia.
Keep in mind, however, what they replaced the article about Jimbo's daughter with:
When one of our staff threw up a bunch of deleted pages, they included one on Kira Wales. Not because they were particularly targeting the little angel, but because they just were throwing stuff up on this site willy-nilly. We just found it here, and removed it. Apologies to King Jimbo for pulling his little princess into the mudfight. Won't happen again.
"his little princess", etc., etc. Even when they're trying to do the right thing they can't resist being dicks.
Cheers,