Andrew Gray wrote:
2008/4/29 WJhonson@aol.com:
Rather what's being argued is that we should report what *is* published by reliable, third-party sources. Nothing more or less.
This is what is being argued *by you*, apparently in some kind of special one-man echo chamber. Everyone else was discussing the problem of uncaught vandalism, which is more or less unrelated.
The fact that they are both major issues for the same type of article does not make them the same thing.
Yes, and let's not derail a discussion of uncaught vandalism by sidetracking in a bunch of other things.