I wasn't saying that anyone writing an article on knowledge should write a book of every philosophy of knowledge. I'm just saying that people should acknowledge that there are others, and ask people to write on those. For example:
The literal definition of '''knowledge''' is something that can be known, but there are many other philosophies about what knowledge really is and what it can be.
==Epistemology== Epistemology says knowledge is...
==Other philosophies about knowledge== There are many other philosophies about knowledge. (''More to come'')
Do you write just from memory? Your post seems to imply it. I usually research to find most of the content of my articles.
--- Zoe zoecomnena@yahoo.com wrote:
No, we shouldn't. That's why Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. Others with more knowledge can add what they know, which we do not. It's not a user's responsibility to cover all material if they don't know it. Zoe
__________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop! http://platinum.yahoo.com