It's pretty clear that he doesn't mean a lynching in a literal sense, so it doesn't count as libel under any interpretation.
FF
On 1/18/06, Rob Smith nobs03@gmail.com wrote:
A editor recently accused others and their source, Prof. Harvey Klehr, of being part of a lynching.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&a... < http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&a...
He has repeated these libels here
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Americans_in_the_Veno... < http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_Americans_in_the_Veno...
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&a...
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Americans_in_the_Venona_pa... < http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Americans_in_the_Venona_pa...
alleging this 'Posse' Comitatus is part of a conspiracy to justify civil rights violations.
Now the editor has filed an RfM to force insertion of defamatory criticism like this of Prof. Harvey Klehr in several articles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_mediation#Significance_o...
What the editor neglects to state in his RfM is his own conflict of interest, cited here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Nobs01_...
and here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chip_Berlet#Human_Rights_Activist
How long will this abuse of legitimate Wikipedia dispute resolution processes be tolerated?
Nobs01 _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l