69.139.6.164 For your convenience, that is comcast, and their whois record is too short, so I do not know where.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:71.107.165.252&action=edi... That is Verizon in Reston, Virginia. Right state, wrong city, depending on technology available. I was thinking that Verizon could, under normal load conditions, keep users in the same 64k block of IP#s, and I do not know that they even try.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:67.233.195.172&action=edi... That is EMBARQSERVICES.NET in Winter Park, Florida.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:88.109.84.158&action=edit... http://www.tiscali.co.uk 20 Broadwick Street London W1F 8HT +44 207 087 2000 abuse-mailbox: abuse@uk.tiscali.com (There is a list of repeated, identical messages of warning via tiscali that are misidentified as death threats on his checkuser page.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:68.110.105.92&action=edit... Cox Communications, Atlanta. That's all I get without calling up their web site. Reporting address should be abuse@cox.com
213.114.174.153 address: Box 47645 address: 117 94 Stockholm address: Sweden abuse-mailbox: abuse at bredband.com
If it's all the same guy, then maybe he really does know something about piracy. The rest of them hav convenient links to whois information. Last time I checked, they also worked.