and how to we get out of this trap?
On Jan 21, 2008 5:51 PM, Nathan nawrich@gmail.com wrote:
If the noters aren't notable, then the noted isn't notable. For a noter to be notable, it must have been noted by a notable noter. Nothing and no one is therefore notable.
On Jan 21, 2008 5:45 PM, David Goodman dgoodmanny@gmail.com wrote:
this seems a little circular. how do we tell who is notable in the first place?
On Jan 21, 2008 9:29 AM, Ian Woollard ian.woollard@gmail.com wrote:
It's only notable if it has been noted by people or organisations in a subject area for which they are in turn notable.
-- -Ian Woollard
We live in an imperfectly imperfect world. If we lived in a perfectly imperfect world things would be a lot better. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
-- David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l