I certainly agree, it is statements made by the arbiter, not by the defendant, which concern me.
"That is not an RfC, it's a rant by a known troublemaker. I see no reason to participate in such a clearly broken process." (regarding an RfC initiated by Silverback) \ Let's check the outrage at the door and discuss this reasonably, ok? Hyperbolic screaming does not benefit your cause. Kelly Martin (talk) 12:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
etc...
Jack (Sam Spade)
On 11/9/05, slimvirgin@gmail.com slimvirgin@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/9/05, Jack Lynch jack.i.lynch@gmail.com wrote:
There have been recent concerns regarding Kelly Martin, but none so serious as her decision not to recuse herself in the case of an editor whom she has clear animosity toward.
Sam, arbitrators shouldn't have to recuse themselves because an editor has tried to draw them into a dispute. If we allowed that, anyone could use that tactic against any member of the arbcom they wanted to see removed from a case.
Sarah _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l