Will Beback wrote:
Have you offered a solution? Are the only two positions on this issue BADSITES or THICKSKIN?
We are not, I hope, asking harassed editors to have a thick skin, to ignore the harassment, to ignore it and hope it will go away. *BUT*, if a harassed editor's skin is so papery thin that a single link to some external harassment, inserted for reference in a non-article-space discussion of that harassment, is construed by that editor as cause for further anguish, I'm not sure what we can do for that editor. In particular: in the process of discussing (not ignoring) the harassment and formulating plans to minimize or eliminate it, we're going to have to talk about it, and we're going to have to include links where relevant, because links are as vital in web-based discourse as bibliographic references are on paper.