On 9/7/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
Guettarda wrote:
On 9/7/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) alphasigmax@gmail.com wrote:
Erik Moeller wrote:
.. and they're going to spam our e-mail queue: http://www.evolutionnews.org/2006/09/wikipedia_youre_on_notice.html
It would be nice to get some evolutionary biologists to review our entries on the respective topics systematically. I suspect there's probably a lot of creationist POV creep already.
It would also be nice to get some creationists to review our entries on Creatonism and Intelligent Design systematically; I suspect there's a lot of evolutionist POV creep.
There is constant "creationist review" of these articles; new people
come
along, raise complaints, and one of three things tends to happen: (a) they are pointed towards the copious supporting citations, (b) they point raise a point that gets discussed at length, often with
the
wording being adjusted or (additional) supporting citations are supplied (c) since they rant about evolutionist POV, but fail to supply concrete suggestions, there is no progress.
<snip>
Oh right, so the whole thing's an astroturfing campaign.
Sorry, I don't follow what you're saying