On 6/12/07, Magnus Manske magnusmanske@googlemail.com wrote:
=snip=
Impossible? The same example I gave, a 4" square image accompanied by a couple of pages of text. Impossible? I'm a starving artist, I can afford to frame a 4" square image, but can't afford the 24" by 24" frame, paper and matboard for the accompanying text.
Who said the license had to be on the picture? I appreciate the ridiculous idea, but it isn't very helpful in a discussion.
Don't put words into my mouth, it isn't helpful in a discussion, I didn't say it had to be "on" the picture. I said it has to accompany the picture, which is what the license says.
So cute. Yes, you're absolutely right about this one. I should have said "in the same frame" instead of "on the picture". Now that you had your distraction, maybe we could get back to the point?
Magnus
Sorry, but the distraction appears to be your only point in this e-mail, there's no point to get back to.
KP
KJI_=[p