On Sat, 10 Nov 2007 16:12:55 -0500, "Daniel R. Tobias" dan@tobias.name wrote:
And, to make that episode's example particularly relevant, there was in fact an external enemy that wished to destroy the community in question; it wasn't just a figment of the imagination. However, the technique used by that enemy was the very clever one of manipulating the people within the community into scapegoating and attacking one another. This is a technique that works fine for trolls who want to cause trouble on Wikipedia, as well, whether they pursue it intentionally as in the enemy in that episode, or simply as an accidental byproduct of their other actions; I'm sure they get a lot of merriment out of getting Wikipedia admins to do a lot of collateral damage in the course of fighting the trolls' alleged activities. If they play the game well, they don't need to do very much actual direct damage themselves; all they have to do is plant enough hints of their continued presence to cause massive witchhunts to be launched against them, dragging in innocent victims.
I can't believe that, having read the Alkivar arbitration and written the above, you do not see the irony in the context of what you have already said here.
My point is precisely that: we have an external enemy who is clever and manipulative, and those who are fellow-travellers with that enemy right now are being manipulated in order to undermine Wikipedia. As Alkivar was. Do you not feel that was a bad outcome for all concerned? Except the WR crowd, of course?
The solution is to disengage from that external enemy, not to defend it internally while taking an active part in the process of division and scapegoating.
Or maybe consider accusations of McCarthyism to be a *productive* contribution tot he debate? If you do, then I'm not interested.
Guy (JzG)