geni wrote:
On 2/10/06, Sean Barrett sean@epoptic.org wrote:
Does the burden of defending information against obliteration fall on me, the contributor?
To a degree. There is a certian minium standard that the article is expected to meet (ie is expected not to look like a speedy candidate). Above that the burned heavily falls on anyone trying to delete the thing
I don't think it's unreasonable to expect that AfD nominators recognize the names of the longtime active editors, and to guess that there might be a good reason for the article being in such a state. I just don't see how someone with all of three weeks of WP experience is going to have developed a good sense for what should be in or out.
Stan