Ken Arromdee wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Ray Saintonge wrote:
This is important. The opportunity to redeem oneself should always be there, and this cannot happen as long as the "victims" continue to dwell upon past injuries. I'm sure that if Brandt or anyone else in his position restarts a lot of nonsense, the community will not be shy about dealing with it.
If the private information is still on Brandt's site, isn't it a ptesent injury, not a past injury?
That's his own site. If you feel that his mention of you there is illegal take it up with the proper authorities. Wikipedia is not a forum for settling outside disputes.
Ec