On 12/16/05, Rob gamaliel8@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm sorry, but if you don't think that the assertion that someone was involved in both the JFK and the RFK assassination is not some sort of lunatic fringe claim that at least deserves some sort of cursory verification, then I don't think the suggestion that you should not be editing an encyclopedia is all that outrageous.
To be honest, if you asked me a month ago whether or not RFK was assassinated, I'd have told you I wasn't sure. Now that I think about it, I guess that fact was mentioned in Forrest Gump.
I guess I shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. If I see a spelling error, I'll just leave it. If someone writes about the POOP equation in a physics article, I'll just treat it like any other crappy article I see on the Internet. When I take a picture of the [[Borgata]] or [[Philadephia]] or [[Pittsburgh]] or a [[wye appliance]], I'll keep it to myself. I won't bother tagging hundreds of images with their copyright tags. Seriously, Jimbo. Unless you take back what you said (or someone replaces you), I won't make any more edits in the Wikipedia article namespace. Can I still participate on the talk pages, or is maybe that too much for me too?
I'm an accountant, not an historian. My degree is in Computer Science. I fully admit to stupidity when it comes to historical facts.
Anthony