On 09/02/07, Timwi timwi@gmx.net wrote:
You don't need to define "good quality" in this case because the "medium quality" admins can stay just as much as the "good quality" admins. You only need to define "bad quality" admins because those are the ones you need to find in order to demote them. "Bad quality" can be determined on the basis of specific incidents (e.g. continued disruptance). ... Although the current system makes it difficult for a genuinely bad-quality user to become admin, it also misses out on "good enough quality" admins because of specious criteria like "not enough edits". This way (potentially) hundreds of users are prevented from helping constructively.
Hear, hear.