Chris Jenkinson wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Chris Jenkinson wrote:
Ray Saintonge wrote:
Your statement that "the other ideas are normally all wrong" is a POV. If your criticism depends on a POV then it too is a POV. A scientific experiment that shows something to be wrong is not the same as one that fails to show it right. To say that something which is not science is necessarily pseudoscience is a textbook application of the fallacy of [[False dilemma]].
I never made such an assertion (that all non-science is pseudoscience). I said that pseudoscience is often wrong. So could you give me an example of a pseudoscience which is actually 'right'?
Your request is illogical. It asks for something right when it is wrong by definition. If I see something as "right" I would not call it pseudoscience.
Exactly - so how is it POV to demonstrate in an article why a pseudoscience is wrong?
Because you had to characterize it as pseudoscience in the first place.
Ec