On 30/05/07, Ken Arromdee arromdee@rahul.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 May 2007, John Lee wrote:
On the other hand, we have firm criteria for what would be an attack site - a site devoted to outing the identities of anonymous Wikipedians, or a site devoted to libeling Wikipedia editors is unambiguously such a site.
The Tersa Nielsen Hayden situation pretty much demonstrates that the attack site criteria are not firm or unambiguous.
I think it more demonstrated the disparity between the failed attack site policy's supporter's reasonable words and unreasonable actions.
- d.