If you're not understanding the point, I'll simplify it - BLPs are important because of the impact they can have, as demonstrated by this guy and his article and the effect it nearly had on his career.
To answer your question - probably not, no. If there is a two page article about someone in the Times, and midway through page 2 it says that he inherited his brown eyes from his father, that is an example of a fact found in a reliable source that does not belong in the article. Salaciousness isn't the standard for inclusion of a detail in an encyclopedic entry.
Nathan
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:03 PM, WJhonson@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 9/30/2008 7:52:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time, nawrich@gmail.com writes:
Our biographies of living people, folks with families and careers, can become the major reference on their lives - so our vigilance on these articles is of extreme real world importance. This event is a very good example of that principle.>>
Not following your point. If there are reliable sources stating that "After an all-night drinking binge he paraded nude through St Mary's Convent startling the sisters at Mass"
Then it should be in his article right?
**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges? Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and calculators. (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001) _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l