I guess the length of the ban doesn't matter in that situation, and a more complex solution is needed.
--Ryan
On 11/27/06, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
So what good does an indefinite ban do in such circumstances? A 24-hour ban to forestall immediate damage is warranted, but an indefinite ban means nothing when the person won't come back anyway. Look at the time-frame of his edits. Someone whose 15 edits are all in a very short period is not likely a long range problem. Someone who has done them at one per week for 15 weeks, despite attempts to contact him is a different matter.
Ec
Ryan Wetherell wrote:
Assuming that those 15 edits aren't outright vandalism/trolling?
--Ryan
On 11/26/06, Fred Bauder fredbaud@waterwiki.info wrote:
On Nov 26, 2006, at 6:53 PM, George Herbert wrote:
So far the proposed community bans haven't been that controversial, but it's going to happen eventually.
Handing out indefinite bans to people who have made 15 edits is controversial.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l