I would rather not post the information on this list, but I am having repeated problems with an editor who appears not to be who and what they claim to be. Namely, they aggressively write articles with bad information, uploaded pictures they claimed they had permission to upload, and were using a sock account to get their good articles promoted. The sock issue has been resolved by their denying it, but discontinuing the practice of voting their articles up. The pictures were challenged for copyright, the editor said they were trying to contact the copyright holder who had given them permission to upload them, but couldn't contact the copyright holder on one, it was deleted, then did nothing on the other challenged images. The editor includes inaccurate information from technical sources, then gets the articles promoted to good article. I am beginning to delist them, but I am rather concerned about the quantity and level of inaccurate information, and I just don't have time to monitor this editor, and check all their information. The editor claims to be a physicist but is posting geological information that any physicist (even associates degree) should know was incorrectly quoted, as it involved rates of materials deformation. I'm beginning to think there is much more information that should be checked that is posted by this editor. What should I do? How should I go about this considering how littel time I have? None. Let's leave the editor's name off the mailing list for now, but please offer me some general solutions and approaches that are easy for a time-stressed editor. Thanks. KP