*Wonders what hopes we have if we can't even keep the bio of someone we know well up to date*
I think it's simply a case of "somebody else will update this," rather than an inherent failure of our editing model. Articles do, by-and-large, get kept very up to date.
*AGK*
2008/8/14 geni geniice@gmail.com
2008/8/14 Kwan Ting Chan ktc@ktchan.info:
On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 21:24 -0400, Casey Brown wrote:
*wonders why people look to enwiki articles for internal Foundation
information*
*Wonders what hopes we have if we can't even keep the bio of someone we know well up to date*
KTC
Knowing well is original research. But yes aside from really notable people and things are articles tend not to be totally up to date. This isn't generally a problem. Being say a season behind on a footballer or missing a uni prof's latest publications isn't a critical flaw.
-- geni
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l