How is that a reliable source for the essjay article?
- White Cat
On 6/30/07, The Cunctator cunctator@gmail.com wrote:
Oh, and the New York Times, today. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/books/29book.html
On 6/29/07, White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.neko@gmail.com wrote:
Why do you have such a list?
- White Cat
On 6/29/07, C.J. Croy cjcroy@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/28/07, Blu Aardvark jeffrey.latham@gmail.com wrote:
Why does Wikipedia have to have an entry on everything that is
reported
by some media source or other?
Yes, the event was covered by a few reliable sources, but it didn't
take
long for the media to forget all about it.
The media hasn't forgotten about it. In the last three months, the following publications have all mentioned the Essjay fiasco when discussing Wikipedia. -InformationWeek (June 4th) -PC Magazine(May 22) -U.S. Catholic (May) -Sunday Times (apr 22) -LA Times (Apr 9) -Jerusalem Post (Apr 6) -et Cetera magazine (Apr) -The Grand Rapids Press (Apr 1)
Essjay isn't going away any time soon.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l