Quoting Phil Sandifer Snowspinner@gmail.com:
On Oct 17, 2007, at 5:56 PM, William Pietri wrote:
* The community at large, in the same way we determine otherthings
If anybody ever looked at RFA and thought, wistfully, "this could be a more disfunctional and horrendously fucked up page," opening community evaluation of harassment and requests for legal assistance is the solution for you.
I can just see the oppose votes now.
*'''Oppose''' Didn't use enough edit summaries. ~~~~ *'''Oppose''' Harassement wasn't wasn't over a Featured Article. ~~~~ *'''Oppose''' Case is insufficiently juicy. Needs more gossip. ~~~~ *'''oppose''' Did not add sufficient detail to nomination. ~~~~ *'''oppose''' Self nom. ~~~~ *'''oppose''' per above. ~~~~
Did I miss any?