On 10/26/06, Sam Korn smoddy@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/26/06, Earle Martin wikipedia@downlode.org wrote:
A touch of logic in the engine that recognised a diff as a revert of the previous edit (i.e., identical to the last-but-one revision) would be useful. Then a summary-less revert could be rejected with the message "edit reversions must be given a summary".
I think making edit-summaries mandatory for anonymous users is an excellent idea.
(Making it mandatory for registered users would have the added advantage of removing it as an RfA criterion)
Hmm. Interesting.
I was thinking about making it mandatory for anons, but for everyone is even a different spin.