Christopher Mahan wrote:
--- Mark Richards marich712000@yahoo.com wrote:
I think we don't need to reduce the number, so much as ensure that they are following community made guidelines. Mark
But if the sysops don't, surely they need to be desysopped.
Also: people who have been inactive for a while (6 months or more) should perhaps be desysopped (with cursory reinstatement if needed).
I've considered that process which I would call desysopping without prejudice. I would have suggested 90 days, but would not oppose 6 months. This group has done nothing wrong; they just aren't around. For re-admission they just need to let us know that they are back and active. Some very good people would be a part of this group.
Ec