On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Philip Sandifer snowspinner@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 10, 2009, at 2:11 PM, toddmallen wrote:
He might also choose to blog about his dog. That doesn't mean we should have an article on that either.
If his dog were an online game, i.e. his area of expertise, then yes, his blogging about it would mean that. Or at least, be a good sign of that.
-Phil
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Not really sure that holds water either. If it were an expert dog trainer blogging about their dog, that still wouldn't really be a reason for an article on that dog.
Fact-checking and publication by someone other than oneself are required for good reason.