james duffy wrote:
I think wiki does need as it develops to be able to have some 'final' articles that, having reached a clear standard of accuracy, readability etc can he removed from the editing process.
Removing an article from the editing process isn't a great idea; for example, as books come on to [[Distributed Proofreaders]] we can get access to public domain images which may have a place in an article; I have a few pictures from the "Bellows and Blowing Machines" article, as well as some incomplete text, which could add to the bellows article, once I have the complete text (and have "weeded" it).
As for the sifter idea, I'd love to see it done like the languages links; "Click to see a certified version of this article" or whatever, but I recognise that this would give a catch-22 type situation.