On 16 May 2007 at 17:29, Will Beback will.beback.1@gmail.com wrote:
While KPB's comments are correct, there is something to what Merkey wrote. Wikipedia articles should reflect all major points of view and significant facts. Tribal recognition by the U.S. Government is a major characteristic of modern Indian tribes.
Certainly... given that this recognition is significant, it should certainly be noted with respect to any tribes to which it applies, and none for which it does not, and the policies on requiring reliable sources for all assertions and not publishing original research must apply. But does this require a specific policy enshrining Federal Indian tribe recognition to special status that can be enforced onto all aspects of how articles on actual or alleged tribes must be written and categorized?
On the talk page for that policy: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Native_American_Tribes Merkey makes what I see as an indefensibly ridiculous statement in support of the proposed policy:
Next the Native tribes lobby Congress (which most Tribes have speed dial lists of all the Congressman and Senators) and pass a law called "The Native American Internet Accuracy Act" making it a felony for Wikipedia to post ANYTHING about tribes. Don't laugh, that's how powerful these tribes are. Jeffrey Vernon Merkey 05:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC) NOTE. And such a law will withstand challenges under the 1st ammendment because it deals with the commerce clause and a relationship with a sovereign political entity, and the US Supreme Court says, "Congress power to regulate trade with Indian Tribes is constitutional in nature and the first ammentmend does not apply." Surprise.
Anybody who thinks that Congress would pass, or the Supreme Court affirm, such a clearly unconstitutional law deserves to be taken away to a place with padded cells, rather than to be permitted to have any influence on the development of Wikipedia policy.